SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Najpopularniejsze domeny dla Twojej firmy w nazwa.pl (reklama)
Myślisz o zdobyciu zagranicznych rynków? Chcesz mieć adresy WWW w najbardziej rozpoznawalnych domenach? A może chciałbyś zabezpieczyć swoją markę przed wykorzystaniem jej przez kogoś innego? Powinieneś więc rozważyć rejestrację firmowych adresów WWW zawierających najpopularniejsze rozszerzenia używane na świecie.

 

190524984258_540560007213Josef Bacik
This patch removes the pinned_mutex. The extent io map has an internal tree lock that protects the tree itself, and since we only copy the extent io map when we are committing the transaction we don

 
152924314073_584160007135Josef Bacik
This patch removes the pinned_mutex. The extent io map has an internal tree lock that protects the tree itself, and since we only copy the extent io map when we are committing the transaction we don

 
182525234377_537860007921CSights
This patch cleans up the free space cache code a bit. It better documents the idiosyncrasies of tree_search_offset and makes the code make a bit more sense. I took out the info allocation at the sta

 
199025154022_531960007208CSights
This patch cleans up the free space cache code a bit. It better documents the idiosyncrasies of tree_search_offset and makes the code make a bit more sense. I took out the info allocation at the sta

 
116423804631_517960007792Chris Mason

 
195926564289_521760007875Chris Mason

 
143025914306_550460007598Chris Mason
This is true, cp makes a full copy of the file. The btrfs utilities include a program called bcp that makes a COW copy of a single file (or directory tree) with a btrfs specific ioctl. Okay,

 
163922564120_501660007604Chris Mason
This is true, cp makes a full copy of the file. The btrfs utilities include a program called bcp that makes a COW copy of a single file (or directory tree) with a btrfs specific ioctl. Okay,

 
193826244118_596160007269Chris Mason
Hi everyone, Here is an expanded example which is how I imagined COW would handle changes to the files data ("file contents"). One can pretend it is an attempt to inject mali

 
116821084650_580060007402Dmitri Nikulin
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:35 AM, CSights <csights@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi everyone,        Im curious what would happen in btrfs if the following commands were issued: #

 
159122464058_588160007119Luca Bruno
There are still some warnings of the form: format %llu expects type long long unsigned int but argument has type u64 In conjunction with -Werror, this is causing some build failures. Now theyre pro

 
175628944710_506160007141Chris Mason
Hello, recently I installed a distribution I want to look at via chroot into a btrfs subvolume on a multidevice btrfs. Now I tried to boot this, the kernel command line in GRUB looks as follows so

 
165920364398_578060007032Chris Mason

 
138329914657_550260007601Chris Mason

 
177121194709_542160007997Chris Mason

 
182325094243_588260007706Chris Mason

 
100021454600_571160007997Aaron Straus
If were waiting for a transaction to end, and it started more than five minutes ago, emit a warning. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 1 + 1 files chang

 
185328664033_525160007085David John
Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/tree-log

 
128420294076_594260007027Oliver Mattos
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:16 AM, David John <davidjonx@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Stoyan Gaydarov wrote: Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx ---  fs/btrfs/ctree.c  

 
154223024146_525160007064Hugo Mills
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:10 -0500, Stoyan Gaydarov wrote: Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |

 
124825464574_549160007964Chris Mason
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:31:41AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: After an online resize, the filesystem reports its new size, but still runs out of space at the old size: [...] Unmounting and

 
119624284109_579660007316Jens Axboe
I tried applying this patch, but the fragmentation_percent function is giving me: WARNING: "__udivdi3" [/home/partition6/yien/git/linux-git/fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! when I compile, a

 
179329934182_582660007828Simon Holm ThxF8gers
Thanks Jens! My research had indicated something about 64-bit division and using do_div, but you cleared it up for me. The fragmentation_percent function ultimately does another divide to get the p

 
191225274858_598860007389Josef Bacik

 
101420104691_516160007414Josef Bacik

 
122525104961_579960007388Josef Bacik
This patch improves the allocators packing ability to greatly improve cold-cache reads. Instead of handling the empty_size logic within find_free_extent, we simply pass it to btrfs_find_free_space,

 
176321974816_587260007956Josef Bacik
Last night, this event jammed up a good chunk of my server: Mar 4 01:51:36 vlad kernel: btrfs searching for 1716224 bytes, num_bytes 1716224, loop 2, allowed_alloc 1 Mar 4 01:51:36 vlad kernel:

 
118727864948_537060007191Yien Zheng
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:50:53PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:06:19PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: Last night, this event jammed up a good chunk of my server:

 
119725244718_505560007186Dmitri Nikulin
I just tried umounting the partition and got this: [ 1395.028651] btrfs searching for 69632 bytes, num_bytes 69632, loop 2, allowed_alloc 1 [ 1395.028661] btrfs allocation failed flags 1, wanted 696

 
144425264197_513560007459Hugo Mills
This is just a hunch, but maybe the handling of spare files (such as .vdi) is not ideal or not what were used to with extN. Normally "skipped" blocks do not count towards the disk f

 
155029134970_551060007970Jan Engelhardt
This patch lets each root keep track of a small area of contigous space from which to allocate from in order to keep blocks for different roots interleaving themselves on disk. This happens in two p

 
189824744167_571460007160Jan Engelhardt
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:09:38AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Hi, The following oops was obtained by doing some copying; its tainted-P by nvidia but maybe it still gives some hints.

 
166925334947_561760007559Jan Engelhardt
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:11:06PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Tuesday 2009-03-03 16:40, Josef Bacik wrote: The following oops was obtained by doing some copying; its tainted-P by

 
180821004082_552660007593Peter Vander Klippe
Hi, I just wanted to inform you all that Ive built btrfs packages for ubuntu (intrepid). You can find them in my PPA ( rel="nofollow" launchpad.net/~brcha/+archive/ppa launchpad.net/~brcha/+a

 
171326014119_591060007807Marc Schoechlin
Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) ## Test environment: - IBM System z900 Mainframe - Debian SID with 64 Bit Kernel - GIT Sourc

 
136922864719_533860007431Marc Schoechlin
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:16 +0100, Marc Schoechlin wrote: Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) Thanks, Ill try to repro

 
130826944905_547560007250Josef Bacik
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:36:08PM +0100, Marc Schoechlin (linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: [ 359.658789] btrfs allocation failed flags 68, wanted 4096 [ 359.659966] space_info has 932491264

 
163520754784_558260007687Lee Trager
Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took out the delayed unlink code, it wasnt making a big enough difference in any benchmarks to justify

 
114025004788_522260007944Lee Trager
Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took out the delayed unlink code, it wasnt making a big enough difference in any benchmarks to justify

 
181627384544_593660007280Lee Trager

 
174220164567_546160007362Lee Trager

 
189226634055_579760007463Steven Pratt

 
104627734539_583160007231Steven Pratt

 
151724954731_530460007757Steven Pratt
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:54 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took

 
124825324495_579360007143Steven Pratt
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 22:07:33 Steven Pratt escribió: All in all good progress. Results and graphs can be found here: rel="nofollow" btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/h

 
107322094159_564060007515Steven Pratt
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:54 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took

 
100225634177_505860007315Chris Ball
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 23:55:08 Steven Pratt escribió: Unless I am missing something, what you are referring to is a simple wraping/alignment issue in the key on the long name

 
152124064087_505960007442Steven Pratt
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 22:07:33 Steven Pratt escribió: All in all good progress. Results and graphs can be found here: rel="nofollow" btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/h

 
129127544937_502260007653Yan Zheng
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:13:10PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, This patch (against experimental HEAD) attempts to make shrinking more robust, by only updating device size if weve succeeded

 
177923064185_527460007653Chris Ball
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 23:55:08 Steven Pratt escribió: Unless I am missing something, what you are referring to is a simple wraping/alignment issue in the key on the long name

 

 

home   |    register   |    login